From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752399AbcAVIQr (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:16:47 -0500 Received: from duck.fensystems.co.uk ([212.13.204.60]:47288 "EHLO duck.fensystems.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562AbcAVIQj (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:16:39 -0500 Message-ID: <56A1E528.50904@ipxe.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:15:36 +0000 From: Michael Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Rusty Russell , Andy Lutomirski , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Jan Beulich , joro@8bytes.org, Andrey Ryabinin , andreyknvl@google.com, long.wanglong@huawei.com, qiuxishi@huawei.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Valentin Rothberg , Peter Senna Tschudin , X86 ML , Michal Marek , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Michael Matz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables References: <1450217797-19295-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <56731D32.4040900@zytor.com> <20151217234625.GM20409@wotan.suse.de> <56738AAF.2080601@zytor.com> <56738E29.3070605@zytor.com> <56A13D42.7040500@zytor.com> <20160121213732.GG15622@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20160121213732.GG15622@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/01/16 21:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:33:43PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a >> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which >> I've folded in, it seems that works but if we care about ICC those >> folks should perhaps help review as well. > > I didn't know the kernel could even be compiled with ICC? Thought > only GCC worked? > > Anyhow - it may be that those fixes were for quite old ICC versions. > Does the latest one manifest these oddities? I haven't tested building iPXE with icc for some time. (The support for icc was originally added with the plan to be able to compile to EFI Byte Code; this plan was swiftly abandoned.) The most recent version of icc that I have personally used with that code was 10.1.018. Michael