From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753924AbcAVPqE (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:46:04 -0500 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.107]:54343 "EHLO e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753694AbcAVPp6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:45:58 -0500 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: borntraeger@de.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: cgroups@vger.kernel.org;kvm@vger.kernel.org;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-4.5-fixes] cpuset: make mm migration asynchronous To: Tejun Heo References: <56978452.6010606@de.ibm.com> <20160114195630.GA3520@mtj.duckdns.org> <5698A023.9070703@de.ibm.com> <20160115164023.GH3520@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160119171841.GP3520@mtj.duckdns.org> <56A23BA8.1040403@de.ibm.com> <20160122152232.GB32380@htj.duckdns.org> Cc: Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-s390 , KVM list , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com From: Christian Borntraeger Message-ID: <56A24EAD.1010507@de.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:45:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160122152232.GB32380@htj.duckdns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16012215-0041-0000-0000-00000742302A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/22/2016 04:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Christian. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> Hmmm I just realized that this patch slightly differs from the one that >> I tested. Do we need a retest? > > It should be fine but I'd appreciate if you can test it again. I did restart the test after I wrote the mail. The latest version from this mail thread is still fine as far as I can tell. Thanks Christian