From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753351AbcAVTmV (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:42:21 -0500 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.103]:54118 "EHLO e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751292AbcAVTmS (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:42:18 -0500 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: borntraeger@de.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting To: Linus Torvalds , Cyrill Gorcunov References: <20151228211015.GL2194@uranus> Cc: LKML , Linux MM , Quentin Casasnovas , Vegard Nossum , Andrew Morton , Willy Tarreau , Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Vladimir Davydov , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Pavel Emelyanov , Peter Zijlstra From: Christian Borntraeger Message-ID: <56A28613.5070104@de.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:42:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16012219-0029-0000-0000-0000058F72CD Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/28/2015 11:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the >> changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you >> fine with accounting not only anonymous memory in VmData? > > The patch looks ok to me. I guess if somebody relies on old behavior > we may have to tweak it a bit, but on the whole this looks sane and > I'd be happy to merge it in the 4.5 merge window (and maybe even have > it marked for stable if it works out) > Just want to mention that this patch breaks older versions of valgrind (including the current release) https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357833 It is fixed in trunk (and even triggered some good cleanups, so the valgrind developers do NOT want it to get reverted). Rawhide already has the valgrind fix, others might not, so if we consider this for stable, things might break here and there, but in general this looks like a good cleanup. Christian