From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:07:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A5F3C8.4050202@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160125100248.GB4298@osiris>
On 01/25/2016 11:02 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> + By default this option will be almost for free and can be activated
>>>> + in distribution kernels. The overhead and the debugging can be enabled
>>>> + by DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT or the debug_pagealloc command line
>>>> + parameter.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but it's not almost for free and should not be used by distribution
>>> kernels. If we have DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enabled, at least on s390 we will not
>>> make use of 2GB and 1MB pagetable entries for the identy mapping anymore.
>>> Instead we will only use 4K mappings.
>>
>> Hmmm, can we change these code areas to use debug_pagealloc_enabled? I guess
>> this evaluated too late?
>
> Yes, that should be possible. "debug_pagealloc" is an early_param, which
> will be evaluated before we call paging_init() (both in
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c).
>
> So it looks like this can be trivially changed. (replace the ifdefs in
> arch/s390/mm/vmem.c with debug_pagealloc_enabled()).
>
>>> I assume this is true for all architectures since freeing pages can happen
>>> in any context and therefore we can't allocate memory in order to split
>>> page tables.
>>>
>>> So enabling this will cost memory and put more pressure on the TLB.
>>
>> So I will change the description and drop the "if unsure" statement.
>
> Well, given that we can change it like above... I don't care anymore ;)
Ok, I will give it a try, and come back with a rewording or an s390 patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 9:19 [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-25 9:41 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-01-25 9:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-25 10:02 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-01-25 10:07 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2016-01-25 11:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A5F3C8.4050202@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox