From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752672AbcBAJ1G (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:27:06 -0500 Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:1999 "EHLO hqemgate14.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751416AbcBAJ1E (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:27:04 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Mon, 01 Feb 2016 01:27:15 -0800 Message-ID: <56AF2243.50305@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:45:47 +0530 From: Laxman Dewangan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: kbuild test robot , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Mallikarjun Kasoju Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/8] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 References: <201601310157.sKXyINX7%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56ACEEE1.1050800@nvidia.com> <20160201082553.GW3368@x1> <56AF17D6.2090106@nvidia.com> <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> In-Reply-To: <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> X-Originating-IP: [10.19.65.30] X-ClientProxiedBy: DRUKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.25.59.19) To bgmail102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.11) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 01 February 2016 02:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> On Monday 01 February 2016 01:55 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> >>>> This depends on patch >>>> [PATCH V2] mfd: core: add macro for adding mfd cells >>>> >>>> and due to absence of this patch, it reports the error. >>> If you have dependencies, why aren't they in this set? >>> >> This change is not related to the series as such and so independent. >> I just thought that mentioning on commit log will be fine here. May >> be I missed some points here. > If you have patches which use/depend on it, then it's not so > independent, right? Hmm.. true. I had different thought that the core header is independent as it does not depends on other but this series dependent which depends on core header. Seems something I missed. Idea was to review md header independently and used on this series. >> Let me know if I need to add this to back on series. > > In order to avoid any mishaps, that would be preferable, yes. > I will respin this series to V8 once I will have change from you per discussion on other email.