From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754051AbcBAQod (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:44:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:41852 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752576AbcBAQoa (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:44:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 09/10] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver To: Eric Auger , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, timur@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cov@codeaurora.org, vinod.koul@intel.com, jcm@redhat.com References: <1454106914-15857-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1454106914-15857-10-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <56AF82FA.7000303@linaro.org> <56AF84F4.2080809@codeaurora.org> <56AF87E2.8040201@linaro.org> Cc: shankerd@codeaurora.org, vikrams@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Baptiste Reynal From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <56AF8B6A.8040504@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:44:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56AF87E2.8040201@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/1/2016 11:29 AM, Eric Auger wrote: >> hanks, we should ask Baptiste to get his email into the Maintainer file list. > I think it is: > ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl > 0001-vfio-platform-add-support-for-ACPI-while-detecting-t.patch > > Baptiste Reynal (maintainer:VFIO > PLATFORM DRIVER,commit_signer:1/5=20%) > Alex Williamson (maintainer:VFIO > DRIVER,commit_signer:2/3=67%,commit_signer:4/5=80%) > ../.. Strange, I'll reset my tree. >> > >>> >> >>> >> On my side I tested with of amd xgbe and I don't observe any regression. >>> >> >>> >> Best Regards >> > >> > Can I add your tested by? > Well to make things clear I did not test the ACPI part. I just can tell > this does not bring any regression on the of part. But I am not against > if you don't find anybody else and you tested the ACPI part ;-) > How about? of-tested-by: ... Shanker and I tested ACPI before pushing the patches to the list and we also posted the corresponding QEMU patches as well to the qemu-devel maillist. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/575878/ I'll ask him to add his acpi-tested-by for the ACPI part. > Best Regards -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project