public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: change PIT discard tick policy
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:48:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B22F67.2000509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454516585-28491-4-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com>



On 03/02/2016 17:23, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Discard policy uses ack_notifiers to prevent injection of PIT interrupts
> before EOI from the last one.
> 
> This patch changes the policy to always try to deliver the interrupt,
> which makes a difference when its vector is in ISR.
> Old implementation would drop the interrupt, but proposed one injects to
> IRR, like real hardware would.
> 
> The old policy breaks legacy NMI watchdogs, where PIT is used through
> virtual wire (LVT0): PIT never sends an interrupt before receiving EOI,
> thus a guest deadlock with disabled interrupts will stop NMIs.
> 
> Note that NMI doesn't do EOI, so PIT also had to send a normal interrupt
> through IOAPIC.  (KVM's PIT is deeply rotten and luckily not used much
> in modern systems.)
> 
> Even though there is a chance of regressions, I think we can fix the
> LVT0 NMI bug without introducing a new tick policy.
> 
> Reported-by: Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>

Haven't looked at the patch yet, but this is definitely how DISCARD is
supposed to work.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-03 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03 16:23 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: change and fix PIT discard tick policy Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: fix interrupt dropping race in PIT Radim Krčmář
2016-02-04 13:35   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: refactor PIT state inject_lock Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-04 13:13     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: change PIT discard tick policy Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:48   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-02-03 16:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: remove notifiers from PIT discard policy Radim Krčmář
2016-02-03 16:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-04 13:15     ` Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B22F67.2000509@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox