From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] PCI: Add fwnode_handle to pci_sysdata
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:57:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B24D93.4040202@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160203185127.GE10879@localhost>
On 03/02/16 18:51, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:32:20PM +0000, Jake Oshins wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 10:25 AM
>>> To: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
>>> Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; linux-
>>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; Haiyang Zhang
>>> <haiyangz@microsoft.com>; marc.zyngier@arm.com;
>>> bhelgaas@google.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] PCI: Add fwnode_handle to pci_sysdata
>>>
>>> Hi Jake,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 05:41:41PM +0000, jakeo@microsoft.com wrote:
>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index
>>>> 27df4a6..cd05a8e 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> @@ -1515,6 +1515,10 @@ static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) {
>>>> return -ENOSYS; }
>>>>
>>>> #include <asm/pci.h>
>>>>
>>>> +#ifndef pci_root_bus_fwnode
>>>> +#define pci_root_bus_fwnode(bus) ((void)(bus), NULL)
>>>
>>> Huh, interesting. This is new for me; I guess the idea is that we at least
>>> evaluate "bus" even when pci_root_bus_fwnode isn't defined, so the
>>> compiler can catch egregious errors?
>>>
>>
>> This was a suggestion by Mark Zyngier. It made the non-x86 architectures build benignly. If you'd like it done differently, I'm open to suggestion.
I don't remember suggesting the use of the comma operator, but just to
check that pci_root_bus_fwnode wasn't previously defined.
> Something like "#define pci_root_bus_fwnode(bus) NULL" would be
> typical. What I'm curious about is the use of the comma operator.
> I'm not opposed to it; I'm just trying to understand why it makes a
> difference.
I guess it flags the variable as used, and prevents an overly sensitive
compiler from being loud and obnoxious... Just a guess though.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 17:41 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] PCI: hv: New paravirtual PCI front-end driver jakeo
2016-02-02 17:41 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] PCI: Add fwnode_handle to pci_sysdata jakeo
2016-02-03 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-03 18:32 ` Jake Oshins
2016-02-03 18:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-03 18:57 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2016-02-03 22:42 ` Jake Oshins
2016-02-02 17:41 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] PCI: irqdomain: Look up IRQ domain by fwnode_handle jakeo
2016-02-02 17:41 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] PCI: hv: New paravirtual PCI front-end for Hyper-V VMs jakeo
2016-02-03 21:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-03 22:22 ` Jake Oshins
2016-02-07 10:03 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B24D93.4040202@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox