From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755335AbcBEQCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:02:36 -0500 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:50930 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753129AbcBEQCf (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:02:35 -0500 To: Haavard Skinnemoen , Hans-Christian Egtvedt Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: Guenter Roeck Subject: avr32 build failures in linux-next Message-ID: <56B4C799.5070401@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:02:33 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I am getting persistent build failures with av32 in linux-next. Example for avr32:defconfig: fs/built-in.o: In function `anon_inode_getfile': (.text+0x2ae90): relocation truncated to fit: R_AVR32_21S against `.text'+296c0 All builds but avr32:allnoconfig fail with such truncated relocations. Toolchain used is the old gcc 4.2.4 toolchain from kernel.org. I have been unable to find or build newer versions of gcc for avr32. Does anyone know if a more recent toolchain for avr32 is available ? Another question is if the avr32 kernel still supported, or if I should just stop trying to build test it. Any thoughts ? Thanks, Guenter