From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>,
"Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt" <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 08:19:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B61D21.2010407@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1xwpqiey5d.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
On 02/06/2016 06:01 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> writes:
>
>>>> Example for avr32:defconfig:
>>>>
>>>> fs/built-in.o: In function `anon_inode_getfile':
>>>> (.text+0x2ae90): relocation truncated to fit: R_AVR32_21S against
>>>> `.text'+296c0
>>>>
>>>> All builds but avr32:allnoconfig fail with such truncated relocations.
>>
>> Weirdly I do not get this when I build torvalds/master with allnoconfig.
>>
>> The avr32 kernel was never very fond of CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n, it
>> was always built with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y for actual usage.
>
> 4.5-rc1 builds and runs with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n here. It's a
> fairly minimal config though.
>
4.5-rcX is not the problem. I was talking about linux-next.
Disabling CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE does not make a difference. Same problem.
>>>> Toolchain used is the old gcc 4.2.4 toolchain from kernel.org. I have been
>>>> unable to find or build newer versions of gcc for avr32.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know if a more recent toolchain for avr32 is available ?
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2015-10/msg00050.html
>>> says avr32 has been depreciated.
>>
>> Last release of avr32-linux GCC was the 4.2.4 patches in Buildroot for AVR32.
>>
>> Atmel never upstreamed the AVR32 patches for GCC.
>
> There are patches for gcc 4.4.3 at
> http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/avr32-gcc/
> The patches apply with only trivial fixes to 4.4.7 as well. I tried
> forward-porting to something newer, but my knowledge gcc internal voodoo
> wasn't sufficient.
>
I managed to build avr32 gcc 4.4.7 from
http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/Atmel-AVR32-GNU-Toolchain/3.4.3/
after making a couple of changes in the gcc source to make its first stage build
with a recent version of gcc (looks like one can not build gcc 4.4.7 with gcc 5.2
without fixing it up first ;-).
No difference. If anything, the situation is worse, since it produces lots of
avr32-ld:built in linker script:15: warning: memory region `FLASH' not declared
avr32-ld:built in linker script:140: warning: memory region `CPUSRAM' not declared
in addition to the final 'relocation truncated to fit' error.
Since the message is produced by the linker, maybe this isn't even a compiler
problem but a problem with binutils.
>>>> Another question is if the avr32 kernel still supported, or if I should
>>>> just stop trying to build test it. Any thoughts ?
>>>
>>> I have already stopped building it.
>>
>> I build the kernel and try to fix small issues here and there.
>
> Even when it builds, it often doesn't work since non-DT support has
> bitrotted in many drivers.
>
Not very encouraging.
I'll stop building it after avr32:defconfig fails to build in mainline.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-06 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-05 16:02 avr32 build failures in linux-next Guenter Roeck
2016-02-05 16:32 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-02-06 11:57 ` Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
2016-02-06 14:01 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-02-06 16:19 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-02-06 17:28 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-02-08 16:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-02-09 4:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-03-09 19:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-09 19:50 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-03-10 4:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-03-10 13:38 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-03-10 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 14:24 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-03-10 14:29 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-03-10 14:31 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-03-10 15:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-02-06 15:50 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B61D21.2010407@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
--cc=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox