From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755736AbcBHQsf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:48:35 -0500 Received: from smtprelay.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:42869 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755654AbcBHQsU (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:48:20 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] link up validation moved to pcie-designware To: Arnd Bergmann , Joao Pinto References: <20160208164104.GA17268@localhost> <56B8C5B5.5050400@synopsys.com> <2817924.61jZWIvqjt@wuerfel> CC: Bjorn Helgaas , , , From: Joao Pinto Message-ID: <56B8C6C7.9060105@synopsys.com> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:48:07 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2817924.61jZWIvqjt@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.13.184.19] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Our On 2/8/2016 4:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 08 February 2016 16:43:33 Joao Pinto wrote: >> Hi, >> Ok, so what should be the retries and waiting time in your opinion? >> The most typical is: >> >> retries: 10 >> delay: 100ms (usleep_range (90000, 100000)) >> >> These values should be ok? >> >> I am already testing a full pcie-designware platform driver. >> >> > You are the one with the datasheet, not me. ;-) Our reference driver follows the 10x with 100ms delay between retries, so lets follow that value. Agree? > > Arnd > Joao