From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757010AbcBIPRZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:17:25 -0500
Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:19401 "EHLO
	hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756957AbcBIPRV (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:17:21 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed;
	by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:16:45 -0800
Message-ID: <56BA0049.6070500@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:35:45 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
CC: <lee.jones@linaro.org>, <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
        <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <a.zummo@towertech.it>, <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing
 domain
References: <1455020907-4564-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1455020907-4564-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <56B9E93A.2040903@osg.samsung.com> <20160209151421.GF13270@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20160209151421.GF13270@sirena.org.uk>
X-Originating-IP: [10.19.65.30]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DRUKMAIL102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.20) To
 bgmail102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.11)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>

Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?