From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753053AbcBJSt6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:49:58 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:49928 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751549AbcBJSt5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:49:57 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: vexpress: rename vexpress regulator implementation To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown References: <1454089021-24898-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , Rusty Russell , Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Liam Girdwood From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <56BB8652.4000808@arm.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:49:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1454089021-24898-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On 29/01/16 17:37, Sudeep Holla wrote: > The vexpress regulator implementation is currently just called vexpress. > This is a problem because it clashes with another module with the same > name in hardware monitors. > > This patch renames the vexpress regulator implementation to > vexpress-regulator so that there will be no clash in the module namespace. > Can you take this patch for v4.6 ? It was reported @[1] -- Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/29/7