From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752538AbcBKIPr (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:15:47 -0500 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:55096 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340AbcBKIPo (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:15:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mmc: OCTEON: Add host driver for OCTEON MMC controller To: Florian Fainelli , David Daney , Aaro Koskinen References: <1455125775-7245-1-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> <56BB7B2F.60307@caviumnetworks.com> <20160210234907.GC1640@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <56BBD6AD.2090902@caviumnetworks.com> <56BBF83B.8020908@gmail.com> CC: , , , , , , , Aleksey Makarov , Chandrakala Chavva , Aleksey Makarov , Leonid Rosenboim , Peter Swain , Aaron Williams From: Matt Redfearn Message-ID: <56BC432E.8000600@imgtec.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:15:42 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56BBF83B.8020908@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.154.116] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Florian. On 11/02/16 02:55, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Le 10/02/2016 16:32, David Daney a écrit : >> On 02/10/2016 03:49 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:02:23AM -0800, David Daney wrote: >>>> On 02/10/2016 09:36 AM, Matt Redfearn wrote: >>>>> + pr_warn(FW_WARN "%s: Legacy property '%s'. Please remove\n", >>>>> + node->full_name, legacy_name); >>>> I don't like this warning message. >>>> >>>> The vast majority of people that see it will not be able to change their >>>> firmware. So it will be forever cluttering up their boot logs. >>> Until they switch to use APPENDED_DTB. :-) >>> >> I am philosophically opposed to making the DTB an internal kernel >> implementation detail. >> >> For OCTEON boards, it is an ABI between the boot firmware and the >> kernel, and is impractical to change. >> >> One could argue that many years ago, when the decision was made (by me), >> that we should have opted to carry in the kernel source code tree the >> DTS files for all OCTEON boards ever made, but we did not do that. Due >> to the non-reversibility of time, the decision is hard to reverse. >> >> In the case of this MMC driver, the only real difference is that two >> properties have legacy names that later had differing "official" names. >> The overhead of carrying the legacy bindings is very low. > Since there is an existing FDT patching infrastructure in > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/ would not that be a place where you could put > an adaptation layer between your legacy firmware properties and the > upstream binding? Thanks for your constructive advice. That does, indeed, look like a better place to put this. Thanks, Matt