From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>, will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:47:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BDE260.20504@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455227590-9837-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
Hi!
On 11/02/16 21:53, Yang Shi wrote:
> Switching between stacks is only valid if we are tracing ourselves while on the
> irq_stack, so it is only valid when in current and non-preemptible context,
> otherwise is is just zeroed off.
Given it was picked up with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT:
Fixes: 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 13 ++++++-------
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 12a18cb..d9751a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -44,14 +44,13 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
> unsigned long irq_stack_ptr;
>
> /*
> - * Use raw_smp_processor_id() to avoid false-positives from
> - * CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT. get_wchan() calls unwind_frame() on sleeping
> - * task stacks, we can be pre-empted in this case, so
> - * {raw_,}smp_processor_id() may give us the wrong value. Sleeping
> - * tasks can't ever be on an interrupt stack, so regardless of cpu,
> - * the checks will always fail.
> + * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in
> + * non-preemptible context.
> */
> - irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(raw_smp_processor_id());
> + if (tsk == current && !preemptible())
> + irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
> + else
> + irq_stack_ptr = 0;
>
> low = frame->sp;
> /* irq stacks are not THREAD_SIZE aligned */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index cbedd72..7d8db3a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -146,9 +146,18 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
> static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> struct stackframe frame;
> - unsigned long irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
> + unsigned long irq_stack_ptr;
> int skip;
>
> + /*
> + * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in
Nit: Two spaces: "between[ ][ ]stacks"
> + * non-preemptible context.
> + */
> + if (tsk == current && !preemptible())
> + irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
> + else
> + irq_stack_ptr = 0;
> +
> pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
>
> if (!tsk)
>
Neither file includes 'linux/preempt.h' for the definition of preemptible().
(I can't talk: I should have included smp.h for smp_processor_id())
Acked-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Thanks!
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-12 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 21:53 [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust Yang Shi
2016-02-12 13:47 ` James Morse [this message]
2016-02-12 17:38 ` Shi, Yang
2016-02-12 17:41 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-12 17:43 ` Shi, Yang
2016-02-12 17:52 ` Reinitiazling an arm machine without restarting the kernel or rebooting the machine Rudici Cazeao
2016-02-12 17:54 ` [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust Shi, Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BDE260.20504@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).