From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751997AbcBLRiB (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:38:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:33695 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751273AbcBLRh7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:37:59 -0500 Message-ID: <56BE1875.5010307@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:37:57 -0800 From: Frank Rowand Reply-To: frowand.list@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Herring CC: Grant Likely , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/dtc: dtx_diff - add info to error message References: <56B0FD4B.8080600@gmail.com> <56BD2C6D.6000400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/11/2016 5:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 2/2/2016 11:02 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>> From: Frank Rowand >>> >>> If kernel config options are not properly set, "make scripts" will not >>> compile dtc. Update the unable to find dtc error message to check >>> the kernel config and give better advice on how to create dtc. >>> >>> Reword another error message to increase clarity. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand >> >> < snip > >> >> Ping, no reply on original email. > > No comment, no reply. I only reply with "applied" when I actually > apply stuff which tends to be at least several weeks. Otherwise, I > might tell you applied and then miss it. :) > > Anyway, now applied. > >> In the thread about the of ir msi-map patch you mentioned that you have nothing >> else queued for 4.5. Is dtx_diff (and hopefully this patch) queued up for 4.6? >> If so, could they instead go into 4.5 since they are support tools, and do not >> directly impact the kernel? > > It's not a fix either though, so no, it's queued for 4.6 and has been > since -rc1. > > Rob > Ok, thanks! -Frank