From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751212AbcBMSRJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:17:09 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]:34520 "EHLO mail-lb0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbcBMSRH (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:17:07 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: check hardware VLAN in use To: Vivien Didelot , netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <1455296981-27998-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <1455296981-27998-4-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn From: Sergei Shtylyov Message-ID: <56BF731F.8000008@cogentembedded.com> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:17:03 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1455296981-27998-4-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 2/12/2016 8:09 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: > The DSA drivers now have access to the VLAN prepare phase and the bridge > net_device. It is easier to check for overlapping bridges from within > the driver. Thus add such check in mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_prepare. > > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot > --- > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c > index 2e515e8..685dcb0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c > @@ -1471,14 +1471,78 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_vlan_init(struct dsa_switch *ds, u16 vid, > return 0; > } > > +static int mv88e6xxx_port_check_hw_vlan(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, > + u16 vid_begin, u16 vid_end) > +{ > + struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds); > + struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_stu_entry vlan; > + int i, err; > + > + if (!vid_begin) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex); > + > + err = _mv88e6xxx_vtu_vid_write(ds, vid_begin - 1); > + if (err) > + goto unlock; > + > + do { > + err = _mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(ds, &vlan); > + if (err) > + goto unlock; Why are you not using *break*? > + > + if (!vlan.valid) > + break; > + > + if (vlan.vid > vid_end) > + break; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ps->num_ports; ++i) { > + if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, i) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, i)) > + continue; > + > + if (vlan.data[i] == > + GLOBAL_VTU_DATA_MEMBER_TAG_NON_MEMBER) > + continue; > + > + if (ps->ports[i].bridge_dev == > + ps->ports[port].bridge_dev) > + break; /* same bridge, check next VLAN */ > + > + netdev_warn(ds->ports[port], > + "hardware VLAN %d already used by %s\n", > + vlan.vid, > + netdev_name(ps->ports[i].bridge_dev)); > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + goto unlock; > + } Why not *break*? > + } while (vlan.vid < vid_end); > + > +unlock: > + mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex); > + > + return err; > +} > + [...] MBR, Sergei