From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932753AbcBPN6u (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:58:50 -0500 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:48506 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932411AbcBPN6e (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:58:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Move syscon reboot/poweroff to common dtsi for Exynos To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1455042606-10075-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <56C02265.40103@samsung.com> <56C1D4D1.2050108@osg.samsung.com> <56C25982.4020301@samsung.com> Cc: k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti , Alim Akhtar , Kukjin Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <56C32AFC.6030905@osg.samsung.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:58:20 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C25982.4020301@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Krzysztof, On 02/15/2016 08:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> >>> In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level. >>> Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc", >> >> Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node >> and that's why I made it top level in the DTSI. >> >>> some not. Anyway I think we should move to "soc" version. >>> >> >> Not sure I'm following, did you mean to do it as a follow up or >> to add a soc node for the missing DTSI as a part of this series? > > I meant to send a v2 with this under "soc" node even though on some DTS > we do not have the "soc". Optional follow up would be to make DTS > consistent and move nodes under "soc"... but that would be also a lot of > churn. > Thanks for the clarification. I'll post a v2 then moving under a soc node. > Best regards, > Krzysztof Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America