From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
<stripathi@apm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] AHCI: Workaround for ThunderX Errata#22536
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:13:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C3AD1C.2000003@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160216211410.GI25086@rric.localdomain>
On 02/16/2016 01:14 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 16.02.16 11:50:44, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/16/2016 11:38 AM, David Daney wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2016 11:14 AM, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/16/2016 06:42 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
>>>>> On 15.02.16 13:30:41, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:36:18PM -0800, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>>>>>>> There is no need for special Driver, AHCI is sufficient for
>>>>>>> ThunderX, the
>>>>>>> file only contains this interrupt handler,
>>>>>>> is it preferable if this interrupt handler in libahci.c with others,
>>>>>>> instead
>>>>>>> of separate file?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeap, just fold it in ahci.c with surrounding #ifdef guard.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, please use #ifdef CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22536 ... and add a
>>>>> kconfig entry for this to arch/arm64/Kconfig.
>>>>>
>>>> Are you sure, this is not a workaround that is based on alternative
>>>> framework rather on pci device and vendor
>>>>
>>>> do you think CONFIG_ARCH_THUNDER a good alternative?
>>>
>>> No. CONFIG_ARCH_THUNDER should be removed all together.
>>>
>>> Grouping a bunch of unrelated features under a single config variable
>>> creates a very brittle system. What are you going to do when a new
>>> hardware revision is released? Create CONFIG_ARCH_THUNDER2? Which one
>>> of these two would you select if building a kernel? It is a choice that
>>> we don't want to force users (kernel builders) to have to waste mental
>>> energy on.
>>>
>>> Instead, let's try to make things work out of the box without having to
>>> set a bunch of random config variables.
>>>
>>> If a generic arm64 kernel won't get too bloated, I would suggest just
>>> enabling the compilation of the code unconditionally (at least for
>>> arm64). The use of the code would still be gated by the PCI version
>>> probe that is part of the patch.
>>>
>>
>> exactly, that is my initial choice with v1, and only depends on vendor and
>> device id.
>>
>> but it seems a config is needed. how about ARCH_ARM64 then?
>
> CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22536 is exactly that you need. It is not only
> used for core interrupts, e.g. also for gicv3 devices (and now also
> for ahci). Non-core errata (e.g. CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_23144) are not
> enabled in the arm64 cpu errata framework (not handled in
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c).
>
> Thus,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22536
> if (pdev->vendor == 0x177d && pdev->device == 0xa01c)
> ahci_thunderx_init(&pdev->dev, hpriv);
> #endif
>
> is the correct enablement of the workaround by device id.
>
> And, CAVIUM_ERRATUM_* is very easy to handle, enable and document.
>
The code will only run for Thunder and AHCI, becuase its PCI.
> -Robert
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-12 23:20 [PATCH V2] AHCI: Workaround for ThunderX Errata#22536 tchalamarla
2016-02-13 16:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-14 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-15 3:36 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2016-02-15 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-16 14:42 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-16 19:14 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2016-02-16 19:38 ` David Daney
2016-02-16 19:50 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2016-02-16 21:14 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-16 23:13 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla [this message]
2016-02-17 11:29 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-17 18:57 ` David Daney
2016-02-17 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-17 21:46 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C3AD1C.2000003@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=stripathi@apm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).