linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of lock waiter
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:39:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C3CF46.2090307@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160216085111.GR6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 02/16/2016 03:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> My own test on a 4-socket E7-4820 v3 system showed a regression of
>> about 4% in the high_systime workload with Peter's patch which this
>> new patch effectively eliminates.
>>
>> Testing on an 8-socket Westmere-EX server, however, has performance
>> change from -9% to than +140% on the fserver workload of AIM7
>> depending on how the system was set up.
> Subject: [lkp] [locking/mutex] aaca135480: -72.9% fsmark.files_per_sec
>
> My patch also generated the above email.
>
> Please also test that benchmark against this approach.
>

I will ran that benchmark on my patch.

Cheers,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-17  1:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-12 17:32 [PATCH v2 0/4] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of lock waiter Waiman Long
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] locking/mutex: Add waiter parameter to mutex_optimistic_spin() Waiman Long
2016-02-12 20:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-12 22:14     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-13 12:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-13 18:14         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-16  2:15       ` Jason Low
2016-02-16  2:22         ` Jason Low
2016-02-16  8:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17  1:40             ` Waiman Long
2016-02-15 22:06     ` Waiman Long
2016-02-12 20:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 23:55     ` Waiman Long
2016-02-16  3:00       ` Jason Low
2016-02-16  3:30         ` Waiman Long
2016-02-12 22:02   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-12 22:09     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-16  0:03     ` Waiman Long
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of woken task in wait queue Waiman Long
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] locking/mutex: Avoid missed wakeup of mutex waiter Waiman Long
2016-02-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/fair: Abort wakeup when task is no longer in a sleeping state Waiman Long
2016-02-12 20:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-12 21:22     ` Waiman Long
2016-02-13 12:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-16  8:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of lock waiter Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17  1:39   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2016-03-22  3:19   ` Waiman Long
2016-03-22  9:59     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C3CF46.2090307@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).