From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, GregKH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, wsa@the-dreams.de,
broonie@kernel.org, vz@mleia.com, fd@ti.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com,
bgolaszewski@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/7] nvmem: Add backwards compatibility support for older EEPROM drivers.
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:17:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C448BE.30303@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455666097-9115-3-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>
On 16/02/16 23:41, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Older drivers made an 'eeprom' file available in the /sys device
> directory. Have the NVMEM core provide this to retain backwards
> compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> ---
> v4: Add lockdep support
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 4 +-
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 4ccf03da6467..9ad1c2cf75ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -38,8 +38,13 @@ struct nvmem_device {
> int users;
> size_t size;
> bool read_only;
> + int flags;
> + struct bin_attribute eeprom;
> + struct device *base_dev;
Any reason why should this base_dev be any different to the dev in the
nvmem_config?
Should we just not reuse dev? unless am missing something obvious.
Other parts of the patch looks good to me.
> };
>
> +#define FLAG_COMPAT BIT(0)
> +
> struct nvmem_cell {
> const char *name;
> int offset;
> @@ -56,16 +61,26 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(nvmem_ida);
> static LIST_HEAD(nvmem_cells);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvmem_cells_mutex);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +static struct lock_class_key eeprom_lock_key;
> +#endif
> +
> #define to_nvmem_device(d) container_of(d, struct nvmem_device, dev)
>
> static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> struct bin_attribute *attr,
> char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> {
> - struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
> - struct nvmem_device *nvmem = to_nvmem_device(dev);
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> int rc;
>
> + if (attr->private)
> + dev = attr->private;
> + else
> + dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
> + nvmem = to_nvmem_device(dev);
> +
> /* Stop the user from reading */
> if (pos >= nvmem->size)
> return 0;
> @@ -87,10 +102,16 @@ static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> struct bin_attribute *attr,
> char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> {
> - struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
> - struct nvmem_device *nvmem = to_nvmem_device(dev);
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> int rc;
>
> + if (attr->private)
> + dev = attr->private;
> + else
> + dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
> + nvmem = to_nvmem_device(dev);
> +
> /* Stop the user from writing */
> if (pos >= nvmem->size)
> return 0;
> @@ -341,6 +362,43 @@ err:
> return rval;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * nvmem_setup_compat() - Create an additional binary entry in
> + * drivers sys directory, to be backwards compatible with the older
> + * drivers/misc/eeprom drivers.
> + */
> +static int nvmem_setup_compat(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> + const struct nvmem_config *config)
> +{
> + int rval;
> +
> + if (!config->base_dev)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (nvmem->read_only)
> + nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_ro_root_nvmem;
> + else
> + nvmem->eeprom = bin_attr_rw_root_nvmem;
> + nvmem->eeprom.attr.name = "eeprom";
> + nvmem->eeprom.size = nvmem->size;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> + nvmem->eeprom.attr.key = &eeprom_lock_key;
> +#endif
> + nvmem->eeprom.private = &nvmem->dev;
> + nvmem->base_dev = config->base_dev;
> +
> + rval = device_create_bin_file(nvmem->base_dev, &nvmem->eeprom);
> + if (rval) {
> + dev_err(&nvmem->dev,
> + "Failed to create eeprom binary file %d\n", rval);
> + return rval;
> + }
> +
> + nvmem->flags |= FLAG_COMPAT;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * nvmem_register() - Register a nvmem device for given nvmem_config.
> * Also creates an binary entry in /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/dev-name/nvmem
> @@ -408,16 +466,23 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
> dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);
>
> rval = device_add(&nvmem->dev);
> - if (rval) {
> - ida_simple_remove(&nvmem_ida, nvmem->id);
> - kfree(nvmem);
> - return ERR_PTR(rval);
> + if (rval)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (config->compat) {
> + rval = nvmem_setup_compat(nvmem, config);
> + if (rval)
> + goto out;
> }
>
> if (config->cells)
> nvmem_add_cells(nvmem, config);
>
> return nvmem;
> +out:
> + ida_simple_remove(&nvmem_ida, nvmem->id);
> + kfree(nvmem);
> + return ERR_PTR(rval);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_register);
>
> @@ -437,6 +502,9 @@ int nvmem_unregister(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> }
> mutex_unlock(&nvmem_mutex);
>
> + if (nvmem->flags & FLAG_COMPAT)
> + device_remove_bin_file(nvmem->base_dev, &nvmem->eeprom);
> +
> nvmem_device_remove_all_cells(nvmem);
> device_del(&nvmem->dev);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> index d24fefa0c11d..a4fcc90b0f20 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct nvmem_config {
> int ncells;
> bool read_only;
> bool root_only;
> + /* To be only used by old driver/misc/eeprom drivers */
> + bool compat;
> + struct device *base_dev;
> };
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM)
> @@ -44,5 +47,4 @@ static inline int nvmem_unregister(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_NVMEM */
> -
> #endif /* ifndef _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-16 23:41 [PATCHv4 0/7] Convert exiting EEPROM drivers to NVMEM Andrew Lunn
2016-02-16 23:41 ` [PATCHv4 1/7] nvmem: Add flag to export NVMEM to root only Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 10:17 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-17 13:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-02-16 23:41 ` [PATCHv4 2/7] nvmem: Add backwards compatibility support for older EEPROM drivers Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 10:17 ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2016-02-17 13:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-02-16 23:41 ` [PATCHv4 3/7] eeprom: at24: extend driver to plug into the NVMEM framework Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 10:17 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-17 10:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-02-17 11:00 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-17 11:00 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-16 23:41 ` [PATCHv4 4/7] eeprom: at25: Remove in kernel API for accessing the EEPROM Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 10:17 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-16 23:41 ` [PATCHv4 5/7] eeprom: at25: extend driver to plug into the NVMEM framework Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 10:17 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-17 13:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 13:45 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-16 23:41 ` [PATCHv4 6/7] eeprom: 93xx46: " Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 10:17 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-17 13:46 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-16 23:41 ` [PATCHv4 7/7] misc: at24: replace memory_accessor with nvmem_device_read Andrew Lunn
2016-02-17 10:18 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-17 10:17 ` [PATCHv4 0/7] Convert exiting EEPROM drivers to NVMEM Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-17 13:39 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C448BE.30303@linaro.org \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=fd@ti.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox