From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946167AbcBRORA (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:17:00 -0500 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:54002 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1426076AbcBROQ7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:16:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update Kselftest Framework mailing list To: Kalle Valo References: <1455720691-2860-1-git-send-email-shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> <87mvqyrwj4.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, joe@perches.com, jslaby@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Shuah Khan Organization: Samsung Open Source Group Message-ID: <56C5D252.8050303@osg.samsung.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:16:50 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mvqyrwj4.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/18/2016 06:13 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Shuah Khan writes: > >> Kselftest Framework now has a dedicated mailing list >> linux-kselftest. Update the entry in MAINTAINERS file. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index cc2f753..e3acba8 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -6128,7 +6128,7 @@ F: include/uapi/linux/sunrpc/ >> >> KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK >> M: Shuah Khan >> -L: linux-api@vger.kernel.org >> +L: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org >> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/shuah/linux-kselftest >> S: Maintained >> F: tools/testing/selftests > > Just out of curiosity, but why did you decide to CC me? Lately I have > been CCed in unrelated patches without any apparent reason (or at least > that's how it looks like to me). I'm starting to wonder if there's a > buggy script or something? > > Now that I think this more, is it actually because I did quite a few > changes to MAINTAINERS file due to the recent wireless drivers mass > move? > Right. Your name popped up. Not all the names getmaintainers script finds makes sense in all cases, however I don't like to leave out people. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978