From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1947718AbcBRUDJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:03:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:34026 "EHLO mail-pf0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946394AbcBRUDG (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:03:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: samsung: fix the inconsistency in spinlock To: Anand Moon References: <1455817202-3005-1-git-send-email-linux.amoon@gmail.com> <56C603E9.9050307@hurleysoftware.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel From: Peter Hurley Message-ID: <56C62375.3070607@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:03:01 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/18/2016 11:14 AM, Anand Moon wrote: > Thanks for pointing out. > Their is no lock up, just the inconstancy of the spin_lock. > Then I will resend this patch dropping the spin_unlock/spin_lock > around uart_write_wakeup. > Is that ok with you. Yes.