From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755234AbcBVOQx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:16:53 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:51109 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754173AbcBVOQv (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:16:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" References: <1455887316-9223-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <1455887316-9223-6-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <56C72FFB.5090105@oracle.com> <20160219205806.GS25240@wotan.suse.de> <56C79477.3060105@oracle.com> <20160220004251.GA25240@wotan.suse.de> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, david.vrabel@citrix.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com From: Boris Ostrovsky Message-ID: <56CB17ED.7030804@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:15:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160220004251.GA25240@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/19/2016 07:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:17:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> >> On 02/19/2016 03:58 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:08:43AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> >>>> in xen_start_kernel(). Better yet, clear whole .bss. >>>> >>>> (This applies to the next patch as well). >>> So clear_bss() -- oh look, another call that xen_start_kernel() could have made >>> good use of. :) Can you send a respective patch I can old into this series? >>> I'm afraid it is by no means obvious to me where it would be safe to do this on >>> xen_start_kernel(). >> OK, I'll test it next week, it really should be done irrespective of >> what you are doing here. > OK so it can go in separately? Yes, I'll send it as a separate patch. -boris