From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751380AbcBWJcW (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:32:22 -0500
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35406 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750758AbcBWJcT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:32:19 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / processor_idle : introduce
 ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
References: <1449065446-26115-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <1449065446-26115-5-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <12469811.iv3SctjXxl@vostro.rjw.lan> <56C465CE.50403@arm.com>
 <56CB1132.1060202@arm.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jUMcfJw983eJwXExc2Du2Vuycb5A_X+S_QwJzyAysO5g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
        x86@kernel.org, Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@codeaurora.org>,
        Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>,
        Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Organization: ARM
Message-ID: <56CC271E.2020402@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:32:14 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jUMcfJw983eJwXExc2Du2Vuycb5A_X+S_QwJzyAysO5g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 22/02/16 23:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On 17/02/16 12:21, Sudeep Holla wrote:

[...]

>>
>> Whatever alternative methods I tried so far ended up much horrible than
>> this. So any suggestions are much appreciated.
>
> Well, you have to give me some time here, sorry.
>

Sorry for the nag.

> I'm still not done with cpufreq at this point and it's going to
> consume some more cycles I'm afraid.
>

I understand, will wait patiently :)

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep