Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>]

On 02/23/2016 11:06 AM, Shreyas B Prabhu wrote:
>
>
> On 02/16/2016 09:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> [...]
>> +	if (index < 0) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * No idle callbacks fulfilled the constraints, jump
>> +		 * to the default function like there wasn't any
>> +		 * cpuidle driver.
>> +		 */
>> +		goto default_idle;
>> +	} else {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Enter the idle state previously returned by the
>> +		 * governor decision.  This function will block until
>> +		 * an interrupt occurs and will take care of
>> +		 * re-enabling the local interrupts
>> +		 */
>> +		return cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, index);
>
> Minor point. You are not calling rcu_idle_exit() in else block. This
> should probably be
> 		ret = cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, index);
>                  goto out;

Yes. Right.

Thanks for the review.

   -- Daniel


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog