public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, mcgrof@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: Zero out .bss for PV guests
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:52:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CDC39B.3060004@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CDBB0F.9000203@citrix.com>

On 02/24/2016 09:15 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/02/16 14:12, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 22/02/16 22:06, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Baremetal kernels clear .bss early in the boot. Since Xen PV guests don't
>>> excecute that early code they should do it too.
>>>
>>> (Since we introduce macros for specifying 32- and 64-bit registers we
>>> can get rid of ifdefs in startup_xen())
>> .bss must have been cleared for PV guests otherwise they would be
>> horribly broken.  What was the method and why is it no longer sufficient?

I couldn't find this being done anywhere, hence this patch.

> The domain builder hands out zeroed pages.  I don't believe we guarantee
> that the guests RAM is clean, but it is in practice.

OK, that's what I suspected but didn't actually look.

I, in fact, wonder whether this should go to stable trees as well.

-boris

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-24 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22 22:06 [PATCH] xen/x86: Zero out .bss for PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-24 14:12 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-02-24 14:15   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-24 14:52     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-02-24 14:58       ` David Vrabel
2016-02-24 16:22         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-24 16:46           ` Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CDC39B.3060004@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox