From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: "pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
arm@kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:50:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CE880C.8090703@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CE80C1.8040801@samsung.com>
On 25.02.2016 13:19, pankaj.dubey wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>>>
>>> OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there
>>> too, since it's a quite similar bus.
>>
>> I wish I get this feedback before, when we were discussing the SROM
>> patches. :/
>>
>> Indeed this sounds reasonable. On some boards the omap-gpmc is used for
>> the same purpose: interfacing to smsc,lan9115 (like on SMDK5410).
>>
>>
>>> Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in
>>> sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies
>>> on DT as well.
>>
>> Okay, I'll rebase all drivers/soc branches and respin the pull request
>> so PMU driver and other stuff could go in.
>>
>> BTW, just in case, although PMU stands for "Power Management Unit" I
>> don't think it should be placed under drivers/power because it is not a
>> avs/charger/battery/reset driver. Existing power-related drivers are
>> under driver/soc (bcm, dove, tegra).
>>
>> Re-work of SROM drivers could be started on top of it.
>>
>
> Please let me know if I need to take care of any of this work.
Yes, unfortunately I need your help with that.
I rebased mach-exynos/drivers-soc related patches and pushed it to my
next/soc branch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/soc
There are some changes in commits, mostly for movement of PMU driver
(now it is applied first, before SROMc driver). I also applied some of
the cleanup and maintainer patches from SROMc patchset. DT changes are
already merged.
Overall, could you rebase remaining patches on top of my next/soc and
move SROM driver to drivers/memory? You can also rebase Pavel Fedin's
patches (if you don't I will rebase them).
Last version of applied SROMc patches is here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=for-v4.6/drivers-soc-exynos-srom-pmu
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 0:33 [GIT PULL 0/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Pull request for v4.6 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-15 0:34 ` [GIT PULL 1/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Non-critical fixes " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-24 22:18 ` Olof Johansson
2016-02-15 0:34 ` [GIT PULL 2/7] ARM: dts: Exynos DT dependency " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-24 22:23 ` Olof Johansson
2016-02-25 0:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-15 0:34 ` [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-24 22:22 ` Olof Johansson
2016-02-25 0:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-25 1:35 ` Olof Johansson
2016-02-25 4:19 ` pankaj.dubey
2016-02-25 4:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-02-15 0:34 ` [GIT PULL 4/7] ARM: EXYNOS: mach/soc changes " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-24 22:25 ` Olof Johansson
2016-02-15 0:34 ` [GIT PULL 5/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Driver " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-24 22:29 ` Olof Johansson
2016-02-15 0:34 ` [GIT PULL 6/7] ARM: dts: Exynos stuff " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-24 22:31 ` Olof Johansson
2016-02-15 0:34 ` [GIT PULL 7/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Defconfig changes " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-24 22:33 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CE880C.8090703@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).