From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760195AbcBYItg (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:49:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32898 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759389AbcBYItc (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:49:32 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] KVM: MMU: cleanup around kvm_sync_page, and a few micro-optimizations To: Xiao Guangrong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <1456319873-34182-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <56CEBB3A.1080709@linux.intel.com> Cc: yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp, mtosatti@redhat.com From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56CEC018.9030307@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:49:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56CEBB3A.1080709@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/02/2016 09:28, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > BTW, is any conflict to apply my page-tracking patchset on top of this > patchset (i noticed you've merged this patchset on kvm/queue)? Please > tell me to rebase it if it is needed. No, there shouldn't be any conflict. Paolo