From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] perf: generalize perf_callchain
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:27:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CF398A.8020905@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160225164729.GS6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2/25/16 8:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:58:57PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> +static inline int perf_callchain_store(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, u64 ip)
>> {
>> + if (entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
>> entry->ip[entry->nr++] = ip;
>> + return 0;
>> + } else {
>> + return -1; /* no more room, stop walking the stack */
>> + }
>> }
>
> Why 0 and -1 ?
because that's the interface you had for callbacks in
'struct stacktrace_ops' including a comment there:
/* On negative return stop dumping */
> What's wrong with something like:
>
> static inline bool perf_callchain_store(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, u64 ip)
> {
> if (entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
> entry->ip[entry->nr++] = ip;
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> }
I would prefer something like this as well, but it would look
inconsistent with what is already there. To make it bool
one would need to change struct stacktrace_ops for all archs
and touch a lot of files all over the tree.
Way more than 51 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) as this patch did
for no real gain.
It's better to be consistent with existing code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-18 3:58 [PATCH net-next 0/3] bpf_get_stackid() and stack_trace map Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-18 3:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] perf: generalize perf_callchain Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 17:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2016-02-18 3:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-18 3:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] samples/bpf: offwaketime example Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-20 5:25 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] bpf_get_stackid() and stack_trace map David Miller
2016-02-25 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CF398A.8020905@fb.com \
--to=ast@fb.com \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox