From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <vinod.koul@intel.com>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@ti.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from tx_status()
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D0279F.2050703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160226010658.GN5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 2016-02-26 03:06, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:28:59AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> When based on the CCR_ENABLE bit the channel is stopped we should not call
>> omap_dma_callback(), only change the return value to DMA_COMPLETE. Client
>> drivers will do the right thing to clean up the channel after the transfer
>> has been completed.
>> Check the CCR_ENABLE only if the channel is not paused since pause in sDMA
>> means that the channel is stopped.
>> This will fix one hard to reproduce race condition when the channel is
>> terminated during transfer (affecting cyclic operation).
>>
>> Fixes: 1a7cf7b26f25 ("dmaengine: omap-dma: Handle cases when the channel is polled for completion")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/omap-dma.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c
>> index f6bef0d93998..a6b189fdbbe6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c
>> @@ -671,18 +671,22 @@ static enum dma_status omap_dma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
>> struct omap_chan *c = to_omap_dma_chan(chan);
>> struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
>> enum dma_status ret;
>> - uint32_t ccr;
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> - ccr = omap_dma_chan_read(c, CCR);
>> - /* The channel is no longer active, handle the completion right away */
>> - if (!(ccr & CCR_ENABLE))
>> - omap_dma_callback(c->dma_ch, 0, c);
>> -
>> ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
>> if (ret == DMA_COMPLETE || !txstate)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + if (!c->paused) {
>> + uint32_t ccr = omap_dma_chan_read(c, CCR);
>> + /*
>> + * The channel is no longer active, set the return value
>> + * accordingly
>> + */
>> + if (!(ccr & CCR_ENABLE))
>> + ret = DMA_COMPLETE;
>> + }
>> +
>
> This looks very much like a hack, and surely opens a race condition
> up: what happens when a request submitted and pending but not yet
> started? If the channel is idle, requesting status will report
> that the request has completed.
>
> It's also wrong for another reason. If txstate is NULL...
True, I have fixed these up.
> Your original commit adding the original hack that you're now removing
> above says that this is to support polled operation: I'm not aware of
> DMA engine supporting such a mode. DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT is a mechanism
> where requests can be queued without an interrupt to allow batching.
Also it is used to suppress DMA interrupts during audio playback for example.
In this case we will run w/o interrupts and the position is polled.
> See the raid5/async_tx code, which queues a set of operations without
> DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT, with the final operation with DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT
> set.
We only allow the interrupts to be disabled in cyclic or memcpy mode. With
slave_sg we have interrupts as it is needed to move to the next SG.
> As the driver is reliant on interrupts to move to the next transfer,
> the patch which causes DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT to influence whether
> interrupts are sent is actually buggy, and will prevent several
> queued DMA operations to fail.
Yes, the omap-dma only allows the interrupts to be actually disabled when it
is save to do so. slave_sg can not work w/o interrupts so there we don't
disable them.
>
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-26 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-25 8:28 [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from tx_status() Peter Ujfalusi
2016-02-26 1:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-26 10:23 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2016-02-26 11:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-26 12:45 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-02-26 13:53 ` Peter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D0279F.2050703@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox