From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <vinod.koul@intel.com>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@ti.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from tx_status()
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:53:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D058CE.5050205@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D048EA.2000604@ti.com>
On 2016-02-26 14:45, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 2016-02-26 13:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> Your original commit adding the original hack that you're now removing
>>>> above says that this is to support polled operation: I'm not aware of
>>>> DMA engine supporting such a mode. DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT is a mechanism
>>>> where requests can be queued without an interrupt to allow batching.
>>>
>>> Also it is used to suppress DMA interrupts during audio playback for example.
>>> In this case we will run w/o interrupts and the position is polled.
>>>
>>>> See the raid5/async_tx code, which queues a set of operations without
>>>> DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT, with the final operation with DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT
>>>> set.
>>>
>>> We only allow the interrupts to be disabled in cyclic or memcpy mode. With
>>> slave_sg we have interrupts as it is needed to move to the next SG.
>>>
>>>> As the driver is reliant on interrupts to move to the next transfer,
>>>> the patch which causes DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT to influence whether
>>>> interrupts are sent is actually buggy, and will prevent several
>>>> queued DMA operations to fail.
>>>
>>> Yes, the omap-dma only allows the interrupts to be actually disabled when it
>>> is save to do so. slave_sg can not work w/o interrupts so there we don't
>>> disable them.
>>
>> I get the impression that you haven't taken in what I've said, because
>> each fragment of your reply is just repeating what the previous fragment
>> said.
>
> Sorry about that. I got it.
>
>> Let me state that I don't believe you need any hacks here, and this patch
>> is not necessary: the final operation in a set of chained memcpy()s should
>> have DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT set.
>
> calling the omap_dma_callback() from the tx_status() was a bad idea, this is
> why I'm fixing it.
The reason that we need to be able to determine if the channel is done with
the copy by polling the tx_status is: we need to read and write tiler
registers with DMA on dra7 as per one ERRATA document. This read/write can be
executed in interrupt context so we can not rely on DMA callback to be
notified about the completion of the read/write.
> As for the DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT not enabling interrupt was introduced by:
> 4ce98c0a20bef (dmaengine: omap-dma: Add support for memcpy)
>
> While we do not have users submitting multiple descriptors I agree that this
> is a possibility and the driver should not fail in such a case.
> I can send a followup patch to fix the omap_dma_prep_dma_memcpy()
With the updated patch based on your comments I can fix the polling in the
tx_status callback and with a separate patch I can address your concern
regarding to multiple transfers queued with only the last one having
DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT (and callback provided).
--
Péter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-26 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-25 8:28 [PATCH] dmaengine: omap-dma: Do not call omap_dma_callback() from tx_status() Peter Ujfalusi
2016-02-26 1:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-26 10:23 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-02-26 11:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-26 12:45 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-02-26 13:53 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D058CE.5050205@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox