From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753239AbcCALmW (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:42:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:44393 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750722AbcCALmV (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:42:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ARM64: dts: amlogic: Extend GXBaby GIC node To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= , Andre Przywara , linux-meson@googlegroups.com References: <1456789465-2962-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1456789465-2962-8-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <56D57673.8030702@arm.com> <56D57A7F.5020806@suse.de> Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Catalin Marinas , Nicolas Saenz , Will Deacon , LKML , Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , Carlo Caione , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <56D58014.30701@suse.com> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:42:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56D57A7F.5020806@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/03/16 12:18, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi Andre, > > Am 01.03.2016 um 12:01 schrieb Andre Przywara: >> On 29/02/16 23:44, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Add GICH and GICV resources for HYP mode - guess based on other vendors. >> >> Do you know if the firmware allows the kernel to be entered in EL2 >> (which is the arm64 name for HYP)? >> So can we run kvm? >> If you have a booted kernel, can you grep for "EL2" and "kvm" in the dmesg? > > I do not have a rootfs yet (MMC v5 patches by Carlo are still waiting > for review), but with this change the KVM driver initializes okay - the > purpose of this patch! > >> Also you should merge this patch into 3/8, same for 8/8. > > If people confirm this is generally or specifically for this SoC correct > then sure. So far 3/8 seems a safe subset for lack of public documentation. > Yes, this is generally correct. Actually without 8/8 you won't be able to run an initramfs. Regards, Matthias