From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
<lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>,
<swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:42:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D68453.4070401@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160302043506.GC18327@sirena.org.uk>
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 10:05 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:05:26AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 09:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> You're not trying to scale the value here, you're trying to replace the
>>> value because the PMIC is incapable of delivering the advertised ramp
>>> rate. Trying to express this as a multiple of the advertised ramp rate
>>> is just adding complexity.
>> So should we provide absolute ramp value here for platform specific?
> Yes, otherwise if the PMIC vendor respecifies their ramp rates to
> reflect reality and the driver is updated then your DT will be broken.
Then can we have other member for pmic ramp time register configuration
via DT.
So measured value on platform will be existing ramp-delay and the value
which will be configured in PMIC will be via pmic-ramp-delay if provided
otherwise use ramp-delay.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-29 14:40 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-29 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: " Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-01 2:23 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-01 3:48 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02 3:38 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02 3:35 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-02 4:35 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-02 6:12 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2016-03-15 13:41 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 14:48 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-16 11:30 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-19 4:31 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-19 8:35 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-30 13:29 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-30 18:16 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 7:06 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 16:51 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:13 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 17:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 17:47 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:31 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:45 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:39 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 18:59 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 18:59 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 19:22 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-31 19:48 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-31 20:39 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-01 7:15 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-01 16:11 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-05 8:01 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-12 1:02 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12 13:29 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-13 6:53 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:01 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 10:55 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:56 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-19 15:47 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D68453.4070401@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).