From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Make sure verify_cpu has a good stack
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:39:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D73349.3020609@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160302181556.GD8362@pd.tnic>
On 03/02/16 10:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:53:28AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Please explain why we can't use rip-relative addressing in some form...
>
> We *can* do almost what Brian suggested:
>
> movq stack_start(%rip), %rsp
> subq $__START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
>
> But we still have to subtract __START_KERNEL_map.
>
Well, we definitely should use %rip-relative addressing if we can.
However, even so I believe this breaks if the kernel is loaded anywhere
but its default load address. I think we need to do something like:
movq stack_start(%rip), %rax
leaq __START_KERNEL_map(%rip), %rdx
subq %rdx, %rax
movq %rax, %rsp
The use of temporary registers avoids clobbering a valid stack pointer
for even a single instruction if we are given one.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-02 11:20 [RFC PATCH] x86: Make sure verify_cpu has a good stack Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 15:55 ` Mika Penttilä
2016-03-02 16:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 16:38 ` Mika Penttilä
2016-03-02 16:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 17:44 ` Mika Penttilä
2016-03-02 16:22 ` Brian Gerst
2016-03-02 16:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 17:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-02 18:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 18:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-02 18:39 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2016-03-02 19:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 20:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 21:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-02 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 21:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-02 22:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 22:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-02 22:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 22:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-02 22:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-03 0:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2016-03-03 1:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2016-03-03 2:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2016-03-03 12:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-03 15:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-03 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-03 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-03 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-03 21:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-03 21:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-04 1:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2016-03-04 2:25 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D73349.3020609@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox