From: Scotty Bauer <sbauer@eng.utah.edu>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, x86@kernel.org,
wmealing@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, luto@amacapital.net,
Abhiram Balasubramanian <abhiram@cs.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86: SROP mitigation: implement signal cookies
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:38:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DF4644.1060200@eng.utah.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308210333.7ad77a29@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On 03/08/2016 02:03 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> static int ia32_restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> - struct sigcontext_32 __user *sc)
>> + struct sigcontext_32 __user *sc,
>> + void __user **user_cookie)
>> {
>> unsigned int tmpflags, err = 0;
>> void __user *buf;
>> @@ -105,6 +106,16 @@ static int ia32_restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> buf = compat_ptr(tmp);
>> } get_user_catch(err);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * If there is fp state get cookie from the top of the fp state,
>> + * else get it from the top of the sig frame.
>> + */
>> +
>> + if (tmp != 0)
>> + *user_cookie = compat_ptr(tmp + fpu__getsize(1));
>> + else
>> + *user_cookie = NULL;
>
> user_cookie is is __user, so shouldn't just be poking at it without
> get/put_user ? It might fault if someone has engineered a bad stack frame.
>
> Alan
>
I guess I got a little carried away with the __user annotations. I will remove the __user annotation from this function
since what we're dereferencing isn't actually a __user pointer, its some stack memory sitting in the caller's stack frame.
see patch 2/3:
void __user *user_cookie;
vv-- Passed in here
if (ia32_restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->sc, &user_cookie))
goto badframe;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 20:47 [PATCH v3 1/3] SROP Mitigation: Architecture independent code for signal cookies Scott Bauer
2016-03-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86: SROP mitigation: implement " Scott Bauer
2016-03-08 21:03 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-03-08 21:38 ` Scotty Bauer [this message]
2016-03-08 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] SROP mitigation: Add sysctl to disable SROP protection Scott Bauer
2016-03-08 21:00 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-03-10 6:36 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-03-10 6:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08 20:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] SROP Mitigation: Architecture independent code for signal cookies Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08 21:49 ` Scotty Bauer
2016-03-08 21:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08 22:06 ` Scotty Bauer
2016-03-09 22:02 ` Scotty Bauer
2016-03-08 21:04 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-09 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-09 22:07 ` Scotty Bauer
2016-03-09 22:22 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-03-10 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DF4644.1060200@eng.utah.edu \
--to=sbauer@eng.utah.edu \
--cc=abhiram@cs.utah.edu \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=wmealing@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).