From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
To: "Emilio López" <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>,
"Riley Andrews" <riandrews@android.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"John Harrison" <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Greg Hackmann" <ghackmann@google.com>,
"Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Stone" <daniels@collabora.com>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] selftest: sync: disable tests that rely on not yet defined behaviour
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:14:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E04BD6.9050502@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457537342-678-10-git-send-email-emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
On 03/09/2016 08:29 AM, Emilio López wrote:
> One of the tests rely on a behaviour only observed on the driver currently
> in use in Android. Disable it here until the behaviour is implemented
> or it is decided it should not be implemented on the driver in mainline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
>
> ---
>
> tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
> index c3e4c01..3f484318 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,14 @@ int main(void)
> err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_one_timeline_merge);
> err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_merge_same_fence);
> err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_multi_timeline_wait);
> +#if 0
> + /* The following test has been disabled due to differences
> + * between the upstream and Android kernel drivers. The behaviour
> + * that should occur when destroying a timeline with active fences
> + * has not been defined yet.
> + */
> err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_wait_on_destroyed_timeline);
> +#endif
It would be useful to have a real define here that can be
enabled later easily instead of if 0.
thanks,
-- Shuah
> err += RUN_TEST(test_stress_two_threads_shared_timeline);
> err += RUN_TEST(test_consumer_stress_multi_producer_single_consumer);
> err += RUN_TEST(test_merge_stress_random_merge);
>
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-09 15:28 [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] Tests for sync infrastructure Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/9] selftest: sync: basic tests for sw_sync framework Emilio López
2016-03-28 11:56 ` Emil Velikov
2016-03-28 12:20 ` Emilio López
2016-03-28 13:48 ` Emil Velikov
2016-04-04 4:12 ` Emilio López
2016-04-07 14:47 ` Emil Velikov
2016-03-09 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/9] selftest: sync: fence " Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/9] selftest: sync: merge " Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/9] selftest: sync: wait " Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/9] selftest: sync: destruction " Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/9] selftest: sync: stress test for parallelism Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 7/9] selftest: sync: stress consumer/producer test Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 8/9] selftest: sync: stress test for merges Emilio López
2016-03-09 15:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] selftest: sync: disable tests that rely on not yet defined behaviour Emilio López
2016-03-09 16:14 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2016-03-28 12:33 ` Emilio López
2016-03-09 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] Tests for sync infrastructure Shuah Khan
2016-03-28 12:32 ` Emilio López
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E04BD6.9050502@osg.samsung.com \
--to=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=ghackmann@google.com \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=riandrews@android.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox