public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com,
	bhe@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	nasa4836@gmail.com, mhuang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] proc-vmcore: wrong data type casting fix
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:43:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E40EF7.1050000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160312044934.GA3173@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>

On 2016/03/12 at 12:49, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> On 03/11/16 at 12:27pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:42:48 +0800 Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On i686 PAE enabled machine the contiguous physical area could be large
>>> and it can cause trimming down variables in below calculation in
>>> read_vmcore() and mmap_vmcore():
>>>
>>> 	tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen);
>>>
>>> Then the real size passed down is not correct any more.
>>> Suppose m->offset + m->size - *fpos being truncated to 0, buflen >0 then
>>> we will get tsz = 0. It is of course not an expected result.
>> I don't really understand this.
>>
>> vmcore.offset if loff_t which is 64-bit
>> vmcore.size is long long
>> *fpos is loff_t
>>
>> so the expression should all be done with 64-bit arithmetic anyway.
> #define min_t(type, x, y) ({                    \
>         type __min1 = (x);                      \
>         type __min2 = (y);                      \
>         __min1 < __min2 ? __min1: __min2; })
>
> Here x = m->offset + m->size - *fpos; the expression is done with 64bit
> arithmetic, it is true. But x will be cast to size_t then compare x with y
> The casting will cause problem.
>
>> Maybe buflen (size_t) has the wrong type, but the result of the other
>> expression should be in-range by the time we come to doing the
>> comparison.
>>
>>> During our tests there are two problems caused by it:
>>> 1) read_vmcore will refuse to continue so makedumpfile fails.
>>> 2) mmap_vmcore will trigger BUG_ON() in remap_pfn_range().
>>>
>>> Use unsigned long long in min_t instead so that the variables are not
>>> truncated.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>> I think we'll need a cc:stable here.
> Agreed. Do you think I need repost for this?
>
>>> --- linux-x86.orig/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>>> +++ linux-x86/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>>> @@ -231,7 +231,9 @@ static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffe
>>>  
>>>  	list_for_each_entry(m, &vmcore_list, list) {
>>>  		if (*fpos < m->offset + m->size) {
>>> -			tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen);
>>> +			tsz = (size_t)min_t(unsigned long long,
>>> +					    m->offset + m->size - *fpos,
>>> +					    buflen);
>> This is rather a mess.  Can we please try to fix this bug by choosing
>> appropriate types rather than all the typecasting?
> file read/mmap buflen is size_t, so tsz is alwyas less then buflen unless
> m->offset + m->size - *fpos < buflen. The only problem is we need avoid large
> value of m->offset + m->size - *fpos being casted thus it will mistakenly be
> less than buflen.

*
Can we use "tsz = min(m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen)" instead?
I think it's ok for this case (both have positive values), nothing will go wrong,
also can make the code cleaner.

Regards,
Xunlei

*
>>
>>>  			start = m->paddr + *fpos - m->offset;
>>>  			tmp = read_from_oldmem(buffer, tsz, &start, userbuf);
>>>  			if (tmp < 0)
>>> @@ -461,7 +463,8 @@ static int mmap_vmcore(struct file *file
>>>  		if (start < m->offset + m->size) {
>>>  			u64 paddr = 0;
>>>  
>>> -			tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - start, size);
>>> +			tsz = (size_t)min_t(unsigned long long,
>>> +					    m->offset + m->size - start, size);
>>>  			paddr = m->paddr + start - m->offset;
>>>  			if (vmcore_remap_oldmem_pfn(vma, vma->vm_start + len,
>>>  						    paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT, tsz,
> Thanks
> Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-12 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-11  8:42 [PATCH V2] proc-vmcore: wrong data type casting fix Dave Young
2016-03-11 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-12  4:49   ` Dave Young
2016-03-12 12:43     ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2016-03-12 13:59       ` Baoquan He
2016-03-13  6:11         ` Xunlei Pang
2016-03-14  2:41   ` Baoquan He
2016-03-14  3:25 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2016-03-14  3:31   ` Dave Young
2016-03-14  3:47   ` Baoquan He
2016-03-14  3:50     ` Baoquan He
2016-03-14  4:36       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E40EF7.1050000@redhat.com \
    --to=xpang@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox