public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: mhuang@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nasa4836@gmail.com,
	d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] proc-vmcore: wrong data type casting fix
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:11:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E5047A.6030007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160312135932.GA3649@x1.redhat.com>

On 2016/03/12 at 21:59, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 03/12/16 at 08:43pm, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> On 2016/03/12 at 12:49, Dave Young wrote:
>>> Hi, Andrew
>>>
>>> On 03/11/16 at 12:27pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:42:48 +0800 Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On i686 PAE enabled machine the contiguous physical area could be large
>>>>> and it can cause trimming down variables in below calculation in
>>>>> read_vmcore() and mmap_vmcore():
>>>>>
>>>>> 	tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen);
>>>>>
>>>>> Then the real size passed down is not correct any more.
>>>>> Suppose m->offset + m->size - *fpos being truncated to 0, buflen >0 then
>>>>> we will get tsz = 0. It is of course not an expected result.
>>>> I don't really understand this.
>>>>
>>>> vmcore.offset if loff_t which is 64-bit
>>>> vmcore.size is long long
>>>> *fpos is loff_t
>>>>
>>>> so the expression should all be done with 64-bit arithmetic anyway.
>>> #define min_t(type, x, y) ({                    \
>>>         type __min1 = (x);                      \
>>>         type __min2 = (y);                      \
>>>         __min1 < __min2 ? __min1: __min2; })
>>>
>>> Here x = m->offset + m->size - *fpos; the expression is done with 64bit
>>> arithmetic, it is true. But x will be cast to size_t then compare x with y
>>> The casting will cause problem.
>>>
>>>> Maybe buflen (size_t) has the wrong type, but the result of the other
>>>> expression should be in-range by the time we come to doing the
>>>> comparison.
>>>>
>>>>> During our tests there are two problems caused by it:
>>>>> 1) read_vmcore will refuse to continue so makedumpfile fails.
>>>>> 2) mmap_vmcore will trigger BUG_ON() in remap_pfn_range().
>>>>>
>>>>> Use unsigned long long in min_t instead so that the variables are not
>>>>> truncated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>>>> I think we'll need a cc:stable here.
>>> Agreed. Do you think I need repost for this?
>>>
>>>>> --- linux-x86.orig/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>>>>> +++ linux-x86/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>>>>> @@ -231,7 +231,9 @@ static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffe
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	list_for_each_entry(m, &vmcore_list, list) {
>>>>>  		if (*fpos < m->offset + m->size) {
>>>>> -			tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen);
>>>>> +			tsz = (size_t)min_t(unsigned long long,
>>>>> +					    m->offset + m->size - *fpos,
>>>>> +					    buflen);
>>>> This is rather a mess.  Can we please try to fix this bug by choosing
>>>> appropriate types rather than all the typecasting?
>>> file read/mmap buflen is size_t, so tsz is alwyas less then buflen unless
>>> m->offset + m->size - *fpos < buflen. The only problem is we need avoid large
>>> value of m->offset + m->size - *fpos being casted thus it will mistakenly be
>>> less than buflen.
>> *
>> Can we use "tsz = min(m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen)" instead?
>> I think it's ok for this case (both have positive values), nothing will go wrong,
>> also can make the code cleaner.
> We can't. Macro min() has a type checking. min_t is necessary here.


You're right, missed that :-)

Regards,
Xunlei

>
>> *
>>>>>  			start = m->paddr + *fpos - m->offset;
>>>>>  			tmp = read_from_oldmem(buffer, tsz, &start, userbuf);
>>>>>  			if (tmp < 0)
>>>>> @@ -461,7 +463,8 @@ static int mmap_vmcore(struct file *file
>>>>>  		if (start < m->offset + m->size) {
>>>>>  			u64 paddr = 0;
>>>>>  
>>>>> -			tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - start, size);
>>>>> +			tsz = (size_t)min_t(unsigned long long,
>>>>> +					    m->offset + m->size - start, size);
>>>>>  			paddr = m->paddr + start - m->offset;
>>>>>  			if (vmcore_remap_oldmem_pfn(vma, vma->vm_start + len,
>>>>>  						    paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT, tsz,
>>> Thanks
>>> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-13  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-11  8:42 [PATCH V2] proc-vmcore: wrong data type casting fix Dave Young
2016-03-11 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-12  4:49   ` Dave Young
2016-03-12 12:43     ` Xunlei Pang
2016-03-12 13:59       ` Baoquan He
2016-03-13  6:11         ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2016-03-14  2:41   ` Baoquan He
2016-03-14  3:25 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2016-03-14  3:31   ` Dave Young
2016-03-14  3:47   ` Baoquan He
2016-03-14  3:50     ` Baoquan He
2016-03-14  4:36       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E5047A.6030007@redhat.com \
    --to=xpang@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox