From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754876AbcCNIT7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 04:19:59 -0400 Received: from bastet.se.axis.com ([195.60.68.11]:47586 "EHLO bastet.se.axis.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752366AbcCNITs (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 04:19:48 -0400 Message-ID: <56E67421.4030405@axis.com> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:19:45 +0100 From: Lars Persson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olof Johansson CC: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: artpec: update clock bindings in artpec6.dtsi References: <1456392854-13527-1-git-send-email-larper@axis.com> <20160313001441.GD17502@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20160313001441.GD17502@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: XBOX02.axis.com (10.0.5.16) To XBOX04.axis.com (10.0.5.18) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/13/2016 01:14 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:34:14AM +0100, Lars Persson wrote: >> The clock bindings for the main clock controller was changed to an >> indexed controller style binding on request of the clk >> maintainers. This updates the dtsi to use the new bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lars Persson >> --- >> Note: This patch depends on a header file delivered through the clk tree in >> "clk: add device tree binding for Artpec-6 clock controller". > > This is a bit painful for us. It works when we get contents sent as pull > requests, since then we can share a branch with the clk header file on it. > > However, when we apply patches that's harder. > > I suggest we merge this after both trees have been picked up instead. Please > resend after that if we for some reason forget. > > > The alternative is to just use the numerical constants now, and switch to the > symbols after the merge window (or in the next release). I'm getting tempted to > propose that solution for more and more of these in the future, since it's a > somewhat annoying dependency to have (and we often have them). > > Either way, we're close to the merge window opening, so let's aim to do this > patch towards the end. Since it's a new platform, risk for regression doesn't > exist, etc. > > > -Olof > Hi So let's be flexible :) We will submit a new patch with numerical clock indexes today. - Lars