linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <gleb@kernel.org>,
	<alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wei@redhat.com>,
	<sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v2 06/10] svm: Add interrupt injection via AVIC
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:50:13 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E68955.5060401@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E004A2.70702@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 03/09/2016 06:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> >>>+	if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
>>>> >>>+		wrmsrl(SVM_AVIC_DOORBELL,
>>>> >>>+		       __default_cpu_present_to_apicid(vcpu->cpu));
>>>> >>>+	} else {
>>>> >>>+		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>>>> >>>+	}
 >> >
>> >And what about
>> >   [...]
>> >   else if (!vcpu->...->is_running)
>> >   	kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>> >
>> >?
>> >The kick isn't needed unless the VCPU is scheduled out.
>> >Or maybe just
>> >   if (vcpu->...->is_running)
>> >     wrmsrl()
>> >   else
>> >     kvm_vcpu_kick();
>> >?
>> >Which doesn't use the information we have on top AVIC, making our logic
>> >a bit simpler.
> Yes, both of this should work.  I like the latter.

Ok, I'll modify this to check the is_running bit of the AVIC Physical 
APIC ID table entry to determine if we should kick vcpu.

Thanks,
Suravee

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-14  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-04 20:45 [PART1 RFC v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Introduce SVM AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:45 ` [PART1 RFC v2 01/10] KVM: x86: Misc LAPIC changes to exposes helper functions Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  6:19     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 03/10] svm: Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  7:41     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 12:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-15 12:51         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 04/10] svm: clean up V_TPR, V_IRQ, V_INTR_PRIO, and V_INTR_MASKING Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 05/10] KVM: x86: Detect and Initialize AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 16:41   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-15 17:09     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-15 17:22       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-16  6:22         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-16  7:20           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-16  8:21             ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-16 11:12               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 06/10] svm: Add interrupt injection via AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:36   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 21:54     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-09 11:10       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 16:00         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-14  9:41           ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 12:27             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  9:50         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2016-03-14  5:25     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14  8:54       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 07/10] svm: Add VMEXIT handlers for AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:58   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 22:05     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-09 10:56       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 20:55   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-10 19:34     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-10 19:54       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 20:44         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-17  3:58     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-17  9:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-17 19:44     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-17 20:27       ` [PATCH] KVM: split kvm_vcpu_wake_up from kvm_vcpu_kick Radim Krčmář
2016-03-18  5:13         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 08/10] svm: Do not expose x2APIC when enable AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 09/10] svm: Do not intercept CR8 " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  6:09     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 12:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 10/10] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-09 21:46   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-10 14:01     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-14 11:58       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 16:54         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-14 11:48     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 16:40       ` Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E68955.5060401@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).