From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@linaro.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb: Account for changes in module data structure
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:56:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E68AB8.6000900@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E5BF25.3030403@web.de>
On 13/03/16 19:27, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
> Commit 7523e4dc50 factored out the module_layout structure. Adjust the
> symbol loader and the lsmod command to this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Testing this has shown me that the module ko search path can find old
modules versions in preference to newer ones, but that does not block
this patch and can be investigated separately :
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@linaro.org> (qemu-{ARM,x86})
--
Regards
Kieran
> ---
>
> Probably too late for 4.5, still a regression.
>
> scripts/gdb/linux/modules.py | 5 +++--
> scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/modules.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/modules.py
> index 25db8cf..0a35d6d 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/modules.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/modules.py
> @@ -73,10 +73,11 @@ class LxLsmod(gdb.Command):
> " " if utils.get_long_type().sizeof == 8 else ""))
>
> for module in module_list():
> + layout = module['core_layout']
> gdb.write("{address} {name:<19} {size:>8} {ref}".format(
> - address=str(module['module_core']).split()[0],
> + address=str(layout['base']).split()[0],
> name=module['name'].string(),
> - size=str(module['core_size']),
> + size=str(layout['size']),
> ref=str(module['refcnt']['counter'])))
>
> source_list = module['source_list']
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py
> index 627750c..9a0f892 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ lx-symbols command."""
>
> def load_module_symbols(self, module):
> module_name = module['name'].string()
> - module_addr = str(module['module_core']).split()[0]
> + module_addr = str(module['core_layout']['base']).split()[0]
>
> module_file = self._get_module_file(module_name)
> if not module_file and not self.module_files_updated:
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-13 19:27 [PATCH] scripts/gdb: Account for changes in module data structure Jan Kiszka
2016-03-14 9:56 ` Kieran Bingham [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E68AB8.6000900@linaro.org \
--to=kieran.bingham@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox