public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, amitoj1606@gmail.com, ao2@ao2.it,
	drivshin@allworx.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
	hkallweit1@gmail.com, stefan.wahren@i2se.com,
	yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] LED subsystem updates for 4.6
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:51:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E7BEE8.2000004@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160315103613.3eb6347e@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On 03/15/2016 12:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:24:57 +0100 Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please pull LED updates for 4.6 merge cycle.
>>
>> The following changes since commit b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
>>
>>    Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/j.anaszewski/linux-leds.git tags/leds_for_4.6
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 7296c33ed12ef13de50e03c76643382123766f96:
>>
>>    leds: triggers: simplify led_trigger_store (2016-03-14 09:22:23 +0100)
>
> All rebased since yesterday for some reason?
>

I just wanted to make sure that no unexpected problem has occurred
after rebasing onto 4.5 release. Is it in some way more advantageous to
base a pull request on rc7, than on a final release?

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-15  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-14 10:24 [GIT PULL] LED subsystem updates for 4.6 Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-14 23:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-15  7:51   ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
2016-03-16  5:04     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-16  7:40       ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-03-16  5:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-16  7:47   ` Jacek Anaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E7BEE8.2000004@samsung.com \
    --to=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=amitoj1606@gmail.com \
    --cc=ao2@ao2.it \
    --cc=drivshin@allworx.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox