From: "fengwei.yin" <fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: remove the check for whole block device for ioctl.
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:49:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E9646F.5080307@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E947F8.2040105@nvidia.com>
On 2016/3/16 19:48, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 15/03/16 23:44, fengwei.yin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016/3/15 22:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:26:07AM -0400, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
>>>> From: Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> a5f5774c55a2e3ed75f4d6c5556b7bfcb726e6f0 introduced the whole block
>>>> device checking for MMC_IOC_CMD while the old code has no such check.
>>>>
>>>> It breaks some ioctl call like BLKROSET from user space. An example
>>>> is "adb remount" cmd. It prints out following error message:
>>>> "remount of /system failed; couldn't make block device XXXX writable: \
>>>> Operation not permitted."
>>>> while the command worked fine.
>>>>
>>>> This change move the whole block device checking only for
>>>> MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD.
>>>
>>> I think mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd will need this as well, as will probably
>>> do any new ioctl.
>>>
>>> So I think the right fix is to simply return -EINVAL instead of
>>> EPERM if on a partition, which will make all the block layer ioctls
>>> works fine.
>> Fair enough.
>>
>> I will wait for one more day for further comments to the patch. And update
>> the patch tomorrow. Thanks a lot for looking into the patch.
>
> There is already a patch in the works for this [0].
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> [0] http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=145812340114153&w=2
Thanks a lot for the information. I will drop my patch.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 15:26 [PATCH] mmc: block: remove the check for whole block device for ioctl Yin, Fengwei
2016-03-15 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-15 23:44 ` fengwei.yin
[not found] ` <56E947F8.2040105@nvidia.com>
2016-03-16 13:49 ` fengwei.yin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E9646F.5080307@linaro.org \
--to=fengwei.yin@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox