From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com>
Subject: Re: 4.5.0+ panic when setup loop device
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:42:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EADE5F.7000601@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1603171258260.3978@nanos>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]
On 03/17/2016 05:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> But we have to clarify and document whether holes in cpu_possible_mask are not
>>> allowed at all or if code like the above is simply broken.
>>
>> So the general rule is that cpumasks can have holes, and exempting one
>> just muddles the water.
>>
>> Therefore I'd call the code just plain broken.
>
> Agreed.
>
> That macro is not really helping the readability of the code at all. So a
> simple for_each_possible_cpu() loop would have avoided that wreckage.
Does the attached work? The rest of blk-mq should deal with holes just
fine, we found some of those issues on sparc. Not sure why this one
slipped through the cracks.
--
Jens Axboe
[-- Attachment #2: blk-mq-discontig.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1496 bytes --]
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index eaede8e45c9c..5a8ab6c2abe5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -118,4 +118,22 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
return hctx->nr_ctx && hctx->tags;
}
+static inline struct blk_mq_ctx *next_ctx(struct request_queue *q, int *i)
+{
+ do {
+ (*i)++;
+ if (*i < q->nr_queues) {
+ if (cpu_possible(*i))
+ return per_cpu_ptr(q->queue_ctx, *i);
+ continue;
+ }
+ break;
+ } while (1);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+#define queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i) \
+ for ((i) = 0; (ctx = next_ctx((q), &(i))) != NULL;)
+
#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 7fc9296b5742..a8756cd00767 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -261,22 +261,8 @@ static inline void *blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(struct request *rq)
for ((i) = 0; (i) < (q)->nr_hw_queues && \
({ hctx = (q)->queue_hw_ctx[i]; 1; }); (i)++)
-#define queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i) \
- for ((i) = 0; (i) < (q)->nr_queues && \
- ({ ctx = per_cpu_ptr((q)->queue_ctx, (i)); 1; }); (i)++)
-
#define hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i) \
for ((i) = 0; (i) < (hctx)->nr_ctx && \
({ ctx = (hctx)->ctxs[(i)]; 1; }); (i)++)
-#define blk_ctx_sum(q, sum) \
-({ \
- struct blk_mq_ctx *__x; \
- unsigned int __ret = 0, __i; \
- \
- queue_for_each_ctx((q), __x, __i) \
- __ret += sum; \
- __ret; \
-})
-
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-17 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 6:48 4.5.0+ panic when setup loop device Xiong Zhou
2016-03-16 15:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-17 1:56 ` Xiong Zhou
2016-03-17 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-17 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-17 10:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-17 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-17 11:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-17 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-17 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-17 12:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-17 16:42 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2016-03-17 18:26 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-17 20:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-17 20:23 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-17 20:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-17 20:41 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-18 2:31 ` Xiong Zhou
2016-03-18 4:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-03-18 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-18 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-18 12:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-03-18 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-18 14:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-03-18 11:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-18 12:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-03-19 9:31 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/topology: Use total_cpus not nr_cpu_ids for logical packages tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-29 8:48 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/topology: Fix AMD core count tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-18 15:03 [PATCH 0/3] x86 topology fixes Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-18 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/topology: Fix logical pkg mapping Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-19 9:30 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/topology: Fix logical package mapping tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-18 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/topology: Fix AMD core count Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-18 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-21 3:07 ` Huang Rui
2016-03-21 3:46 ` Huang Rui
2016-03-21 8:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-21 9:18 ` Huang Rui
2016-03-21 8:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-21 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 9:46 ` Huang Rui
2016-03-21 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-22 8:10 ` Sherry Hurwitz
2016-03-22 11:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-21 8:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-21 10:05 ` Huang Rui
2016-03-21 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-19 9:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-19 15:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-20 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-20 11:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-20 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-20 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-20 13:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-20 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-20 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-29 8:49 ` [tip:x86/urgent] perf/x86/amd: Cleanup Fam10h NB event constraints tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-22 7:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/topology: Fix AMD core count Huang Rui
2016-03-18 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/topology: Fix Intel HT disable Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-19 9:31 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EADE5F.7000601@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=aherrmann@suse.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jencce.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox