From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759125AbcCVLEu (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:50 -0400 Received: from smtprelay4.synopsys.com ([198.182.47.9]:45491 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758759AbcCVLEj (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:39 -0400 Subject: Re: UFS V11 patch-set To: Mark Brown , Joao Pinto References: <56EBF966.8040907@synopsys.com> <56EBF9FD.9080906@synopsys.com> <4014649.ENvamPh3sb@wuerfel> <56EC1675.2050002@synopsys.com> <56EFCCB3.3040108@synopsys.com> <56F11F00.1060408@synopsys.com> <20160322105827.GB2566@sirena.org.uk> CC: vinayak holikatti , , , , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Carlos Palminha" , , "robh@kernel.org >> Rob Herring" From: Joao Pinto Message-ID: <56F126B9.3010903@synopsys.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:04:25 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160322105827.GB2566@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.13.184.19] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, I have no intend to break the rules. I am just trying to communicate with UFS maintainers that so far gave me no response. Merging in v4.7 is fine, but I would like that UFS maintainers give me some feedback about the next steps, but so far didn't have luck. Thanks, Joao On 3/22/2016 10:58 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:31:28AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote: > >> The following patch-set was approved by Arnd Bergmann and Rob Herring and I >> would appreciate that someone from SCSI / UFS gave a final checkout in order to >> evaluate the possibility of still merging it to v4.6 or putting it in a branch >> in SCSI to be merged to v4.7. > > I've no idea why you're sending me this stuff but please stop - you sent > a similar mail yesterday and I see there were a bunch of similar mails > before you started CCing me into the thread - but sending daily top > posted content free pings is just going to annoy people (or at least > it's annoying me) and sending them to random other maintainers isn't > likely to improve things. This is especially the case when we're more > than half way through the merge window and the code apparently isn't > even in -next yet. > > Please stop this and follow Arnd's advice (which you quoted from the > message you're replying to): > >>>> On 3/18/2016 2:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >>>>> I think the code is ok now, but the timing apparently didn't work for 4.6. >>>>> I'd suggest you resend as soon as 4.6-rc1 is out so it can get merged into 4.7. > > If there's some reason to break the process you need to articulate what > it is and give people a chance to respond but that's *very* rare, unless > there is an unusually strong reason people are going to use the normal > development workflow. >