From: Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com>
To: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
<pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: do not call cpufreq hook unless util changed
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:47:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F47C89.9070201@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458606068-7476-2-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org>
Hi Steve,
On 03/21/2016 05:21 PM, Steve Muckle wrote:
> There's no reason to call the cpufreq hook if the root cfs_rq
> utilization has not been modified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index d418deb04049..af58e826cffe 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2826,20 +2826,21 @@ static inline int update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> {
> struct sched_avg *sa = &cfs_rq->avg;
> struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> - int decayed, removed = 0;
> + int decayed, removed_load = 0, removed_util = 0;
> int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
>
> if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg)) {
> s64 r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg, 0);
> sa->load_avg = max_t(long, sa->load_avg - r, 0);
> sa->load_sum = max_t(s64, sa->load_sum - r * LOAD_AVG_MAX, 0);
> - removed = 1;
> + removed_load = 1;
> }
>
> if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_util_avg)) {
> long r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_util_avg, 0);
> sa->util_avg = max_t(long, sa->util_avg - r, 0);
> sa->util_sum = max_t(s32, sa->util_sum - r * LOAD_AVG_MAX, 0);
> + removed_util = 1;
> }
>
> decayed = __update_load_avg(now, cpu, sa,
> @@ -2850,7 +2851,8 @@ static inline int update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy = sa->last_update_time;
> #endif
>
> - if (cpu == smp_processor_id() && &rq->cfs == cfs_rq) {
> + if (cpu == smp_processor_id() && &rq->cfs == cfs_rq &&
> + (decayed || removed_util)) {
> unsigned long max = rq->cpu_capacity_orig;
Should this filtering instead happen on the governor side?
Even if the CFS load itself didn't change, we could have switched from an
RT/DL thread to a CFS thread so util would have to be updated from ULONG_MAX
to whatever CFS needs right?
Also now that CFS enqueue calls cpufreq_update_util, RT/DL requests could
potentially get overridden.
-Sai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 0:21 [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: move cpufreq hook to update_cfs_rq_load_avg() Steve Muckle
2016-03-22 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: do not call cpufreq hook unless util changed Steve Muckle
2016-03-24 23:47 ` Sai Gurrappadi [this message]
2016-03-25 1:01 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-25 21:24 ` Sai Gurrappadi
2016-04-23 12:57 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Do " tip-bot for Steve Muckle
2016-03-28 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: move cpufreq hook to update_cfs_rq_load_avg() Dietmar Eggemann
2016-03-28 16:34 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-28 18:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-03-28 19:38 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-30 19:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 1:42 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-31 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 21:26 ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-01 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-11 19:28 ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-11 21:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-12 14:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-12 19:38 ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-13 17:53 ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-13 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-13 0:08 ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-13 4:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-13 16:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-13 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-13 18:06 ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-13 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-20 2:22 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-31 9:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-03-31 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 9:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-03-31 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 12:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-03-31 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 12:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-23 12:57 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Move " tip-bot for Steve Muckle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F47C89.9070201@nvidia.com \
--to=sgurrappadi@nvidia.com \
--cc=Juri.Lelli@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=pboonstoppel@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox