public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] make sigaltstack() compatible with swapcontext()
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:16:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F59CB9.9030203@list.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457369527-11452-1-git-send-email-stsp@list.ru>

So what is the status of the below?
I haven't seen any NAKs or objections, yet it seems not
applied 3 weeks later. What should I do now?

07.03.2016 19:52, Stas Sergeev пишет:
> The following patches make it possible to use swapcontext()
> in a sighandler that works on sigaltstack.
> The approach is inspired by Andy Lutomirski's suggestion that
> sigaltstack should disarm itself after saving into uc_stack:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/1/594
>
> I add the SS_AUTODISARM flag that does exactly that.
> On sighandler exit, the sigaltstack is restored from uc_stack.
> Another possible name could be SS_ONESHOT, but, since it gets
> always re-enabled, I choose SS_AUTODISARM.
>
> Change since v5:
> - Fix description of patch 4/4
>
> Change since v4:
> - Implement this Andy Lutomirski's suggestion:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/6/158
> that allows the run-time probing of the existence of the
> flags added in the future.
>
> [PATCH 1/4] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with
> 	A clean-up patch that unifies x86's sigaltstack handling with
> 	other arches.
> [PATCH 2/4] sigaltstack: preparations for adding new SS_xxx flags
> 	Andy's suggested changes
> [PATCH 3/4] sigaltstack: implement SS_AUTODISARM flag
> 	This patch implements SS_AUTODISARM flag
> [PATCH 4/4] selftests: Add test for
> 	This patch adds the selftest code for new functionality
>
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> CC: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>
> Diffstat:
>   arch/x86/kernel/signal.c                     |   23 +--
>   include/linux/sched.h                        |    8 +
>   include/linux/signal.h                       |    4
>   include/uapi/linux/signal.h                  |    7 +
>   kernel/fork.c                                |    2
>   kernel/signal.c                              |   26 ++--
>   tools/testing/selftests/Makefile             |    1
>   tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/Makefile |    8 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c    |  156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   9 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-25 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-07 16:52 [PATCH v6 0/4] make sigaltstack() compatible with swapcontext() Stas Sergeev
2016-03-07 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with other arches Stas Sergeev
2016-03-07 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] sigaltstack: preparations for adding new SS_xxx flags Stas Sergeev
2016-03-07 16:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] sigaltstack: implement SS_AUTODISARM flag Stas Sergeev
2016-03-07 16:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests: Add test for sigaltstack(SS_ONSTACK|SS_AUTODISARM) Stas Sergeev
2016-03-25 20:16 ` Stas Sergeev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F59CB9.9030203@list.ru \
    --to=stsp@list.ru \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox