Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: add resets support to dw_mmc

[Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>]

在 2016/3/29 13:56, Jaehoon Chung 写道:
> On 03/29/2016 11:22 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> 在 2016/3/25 13:35, Guodong Xu 写道:
>>> Hi, Shawn
>>>
>>> Sorry I replied late. I added comments below.
>>>
>>> On 6 March 2016 at 22:16, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com
>>> <mailto:shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>      On 2016/3/6 16:47, Guodong Xu wrote:
>>>
>>>          mmc registers may in abnormal state if mmc is used in bootloader,
>>>          eg. to support booting from eMMC. So we need reset mmc registers
>>>          when kernel boots up, instead of assuming mmc is in clean state.
>>>
>>>          With this patch, user can add a 'resets' property into dw_mmc dts
>>>          node. When driver parse_dt and probe, it calls reset API to
>>>          deassert the 'reset' of dw_mmc host controller. When probe error or
>>>          remove, it calls reset API to assert it.
>>>
>>>          Please also refer to
>>>          Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/reset.txt
>>>
>>>          Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org
>>>          <mailto:guodong.xu@linaro.org>>
>>>          Signed-off-by: Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com
>>>          <mailto:kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com>>
>>>          Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org
>>>          <mailto:zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      Really should V2 and add the changelog.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, will do. next version I sent will be labelled as V3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>          ---
>>>             drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>             1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>>          diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>>          index 242f9a0..281ea9c 100644
>>>          --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>>          +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>>          @@ -2878,6 +2878,14 @@ static struct dw_mci_board
>>>          *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>                   if (!pdata)
>>>                           return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>
>>>          +       /* find reset controller when exist */
>>>          +       pdata->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional(dev, NULL);
>>>          +       if (IS_ERR(pdata->rstc)) {
>>>          +               if (PTR_ERR(pdata->rstc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>>          +                       return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>>>          +               pdata->rstc = NULL;
>>>
>>>
>>>      maybe we can remove "pdata->rstc = NULL", and directly
>>>      use IS_ERR(..) for the following "if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)"
>>>      statement
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, will do.
>>> I see your point, other lines in this file are using IS_ERR(!..), I will
>>> use this style too.
>>>
>>>          +       }
>>>          +
>>>                   /* find out number of slots supported */
>>>                   of_property_read_u32(np, "num-slots", &pdata->num_slots);
>>>
>>>          @@ -2949,7 +2957,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>
>>>                   if (!host->pdata) {
>>>                           host->pdata = dw_mci_parse_dt(host);
>>>          -               if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) {
>>>          +               if (PTR_ERR(host->pdata) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>>          +                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>
>>>
>>>      please fix the coding style here.
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you mean to add additional {} for this 'if' , like this?
>>>
>>>      +               if (PTR_ERR(host->pdata) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>>>      +                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>
>>>      +                }
>>>
>>> I will add {}.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>          +               else if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) {
>>>                                   dev_err(host->dev, "platform data not
>>>          available\n");
>>>                                   return -EINVAL;
>>>                           }
>>>          @@ -3012,6 +3022,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>                           }
>>>                   }
>>>
>>>          +       if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
>>>          +               reset_control_deassert(host->pdata->rstc);
>>>          +
>>>
>>>
>>>      sorry, I can't follow your intention here. Shouldn't it be something
>>>      like "assert mmc -> may need delay -> deassert mmc". As your current
>>>      code, nothing happend right?
>>>
>>>
>>> The chip exits from bootloader with this bit asserted. And when entering
>>> kernel, we only need to deassert.
>>>
>>> In my current code, the driver deassert mmc in _probe(), and assert mmc
>>> in _remove().
>>
>> I catch your point. From the previous discussion, we add it to make sure
>> dw_mmc in good state after leaving bootloader to kernel. But My real question is that you can assert it in  bootloader, so you can also
>> dessert it in bootloaer to make sure dw_mmc work fine when probing
>> in kernel. In that way, we don't need this patch?
>
> Doesn't dw_mci_hw_reset work fine? I think that card should be reset with MMC_CAP_HW_RESET.
> Could you check this?
>

MMC_CAP_HW_RESET actually reset the mmc card, but Guodong means to
reset the controller rather than mmc card :)


> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
>>
>> More to think, Is it ok to match the behaviour of bootloader stage?
>> My bootloader doesn't assert the reset pin of dw_mmc, so it seams if
>> I want to fix you issue on kernel stage, I need a new round of
>> assert->delay->deassert.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                   setup_timer(&host->cmd11_timer,
>>>                               dw_mci_cmd11_timer, (unsigned long)host);
>>>
>>>          @@ -3164,6 +3177,9 @@ err_dmaunmap:
>>>                   if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
>>>                           host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>>>
>>>          +       if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
>>>          +               reset_control_assert(host->pdata->rstc);
>>>          +
>>>             err_clk_ciu:
>>>                   if (!IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
>>>                           clk_disable_unprepare(host->ciu_clk);
>>>          @@ -3196,11 +3212,15 @@ void dw_mci_remove(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>                   if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
>>>                           host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>>>
>>>          +       if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
>>>          +               reset_control_assert(host->pdata->rstc);
>>>          +
>>>                   if (!IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
>>>                           clk_disable_unprepare(host->ciu_clk);
>>>
>>>                   if (!IS_ERR(host->biu_clk))
>>>                           clk_disable_unprepare(host->biu_clk);
>>>          +
>>>             }
>>>
>>>
>>>      unnecessary new line here.
>>>
>>>
>>> Will fix.
>>>
>>> -Guodong
>>>
>>>
>>>             EXPORT_SYMBOL(dw_mci_remove);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      --
>>>      Best Regards
>>>      Shawn Lin
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin