From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757784AbcC2RIq (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:08:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:37056 "EHLO mail-wm0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751831AbcC2RIo (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:08:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC v5 06/17] dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_get/put_single_reserved To: Jean-Philippe Brucker References: <1456856877-4817-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1456856877-4817-7-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <20160310115253.GA14609@e106794-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Cc: eric.auger@st.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, Manish.Jaggi@caviumnetworks.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org From: Eric Auger Message-ID: <56FAB656.7030400@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:07:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160310115253.GA14609@e106794-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean-Philippe, On 03/10/2016 12:52 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 06:27:46PM +0000, Eric Auger wrote: >> [...] >> + >> +int iommu_get_single_reserved(struct iommu_domain *domain, >> + phys_addr_t addr, int prot, >> + dma_addr_t *iova) >> +{ >> + unsigned long order = __ffs(domain->ops->pgsize_bitmap); >> + size_t page_size = 1 << order; >> + phys_addr_t mask = page_size - 1; >> + phys_addr_t aligned_addr = addr & ~mask; >> + phys_addr_t offset = addr - aligned_addr; >> + struct iommu_reserved_binding *b; >> + struct iova *p_iova; >> + struct iova_domain *iovad = >> + (struct iova_domain *)domain->reserved_iova_cookie; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (!iovad) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&domain->reserved_mutex); > > I believe this function could get called from the chunk of __setup_irq > that is executed atomically: > > * request_threaded_irq > * __setup_irq > * irq_startup > * irq_domain_activate_irq > * msi_domain_activate > * msi_compose > * iommu_get_single_reserved > > If this is the case, we should probably use a spinlock to protect the > iova_domain... Please apologize for the delay, I was in vacation. Thank you for spotting this flow. I will rework the locking. > >> + >> + b = find_reserved_binding(domain, aligned_addr, page_size); >> + if (b) { >> + *iova = b->iova + offset; >> + kref_get(&b->kref); >> + ret = 0; >> + goto unlock; >> + } >> + >> + /* there is no existing reserved iova for this pa */ >> + p_iova = alloc_iova(iovad, 1, iovad->dma_32bit_pfn, true); >> + if (!p_iova) { >> + ret = -ENOMEM; >> + goto unlock; >> + } >> + *iova = p_iova->pfn_lo << order; >> + >> + b = kzalloc(sizeof(*b), GFP_KERNEL); > > ... and GFP_ATOMIC here. OK Thank you for your time! Best Regards Eric > > Thanks, > Jean-Philippe > >> + if (!b) { >> + ret = -ENOMEM; >> + goto free_iova_unlock; >> + } >> + >> + ret = iommu_map(domain, *iova, aligned_addr, page_size, prot); >> + if (ret) >> + goto free_binding_iova_unlock; >> + >> + kref_init(&b->kref); >> + kref_get(&b->kref); >> + b->domain = domain; >> + b->addr = aligned_addr; >> + b->iova = *iova; >> + b->size = page_size; >> + >> + link_reserved_binding(domain, b); >> + >> + *iova += offset; >> + goto unlock; >> + >> +free_binding_iova_unlock: >> + kfree(b); >> +free_iova_unlock: >> + free_iova(iovad, *iova >> order); >> +unlock: >> + mutex_unlock(&domain->reserved_mutex); >> + return ret; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_get_single_reserved);